Truth & Lies
THE MYTH OF FREEDOM
What is freedom? Is it simply an abstract human construct, centred around 'choice'....where we merely choose our restraints? The 'breadth' of one's freedoms, as we define them, are founded on infinite choices – an illusionary standpoint.
An individual's choices, founded on the concepts of 'free will', have largely been imprinted from birth, cemented within the most intrinsic and primary of human function, – with society deciding what greater scope of collective 'freedoms' will be accessible for any individual seeking them.
If we're conditionally limited in our choices and restrict access to innate desires, in order to appease others, then the aspirational concept of freedom that we cling to, is nothing but a delusional construct – a betrayal of intellect. The greatest lie ever told are the ones we repeatedly tell ourselves daily. Self deceit, the ultimate betrayal, serves as both prison and protector.
Freedom is nothing. But it is the best nothing, and you only become aware of how good that nothing is when you are no longer in a position to enjoy it.
What's the goal of freedom, if we don't from where we desire to be released, or what it is that we want to be liberated, or freed from? Liberty is not a birthright – it has to be fought for. Those born into slavery, desire freedom and will seek it. Those who have freedoms taken, realise freedom existed after it has gone. Therefore, to truly experience freedom, one must taste and lose, to appreciate what it is to feel free.
On a surface level, freedom can be loosely defined as 'a feeling'. On a deeper profound level of understanding, freedom can be an experience, as expressed by those who liberate themselves from inner turmoil. Solzhenitsyn's book 'Gulag Archipelago' reveals the paradoxical statements of gulag prisoners, whose liberties were taken away in Stalin's tyrannical regime, – yet relaying their time spent as some of the most life-defining moments of their lives.
On A Need To Know Basis
What are the benefits of secrecy, other than to protect one's interests and for obtaining advantage? Secrecy is the desire to act without another's knowledge – therefore its potential for corruption is very high. In an open and transparent society, there can be reduced crime, but with no secrets, there's no protection, nor competitive advantage gained via secrecy. Therefore public availability of information has to be restricted by those wishing to protect privileges. Hence, corruption manifests from secrecy.
General D Eisenhower warned us of an oppressive future to come, if we the people, didn't control the agencies of deception. The same groups today, composed of falsely termed 'elites', have deceptively hidden themselves, their motives and processes for pushing secret agendas, whilst their actions have ruined the lives of countless unsuspecting innocents over the centuries.
No Lie Can Live Forever
The most memorable speeches of our greatest leaders, JFK, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, John Lennon, Bob Marley – talked of secret societies, the power of love and the people having this power to bring in a better world. Their lives were all cut short – but their words live on.
Why do many great leaders, who promote love, freedom and joining people together, tend to lead lives cut short? The evidence of corruption, poisoning, murder & assassinations are in abundance. The lunatics that Lennon talked of, are the same group who protect themselves through lies/deceptions and secret societies we have been warned about. There are many channels of truth, with two eyes and two ears to receive them.
The Elites And Chums
Elites are defined as those with wealth, power and influence. But there's more to it than that. Those with blood ties to ancient rulers, descended from the heavens, are said to be the real rulers of humanity. The 'British' royal family are claimed to be at the top, with support from the oil, banking sectors and religious centre, with their families and those overseeing the corporations.
Money awards power. And those who create and control money, can control everybody else. One of the highest ruling elite families (if not THE highest), have close connections to the financing of major wars, bankrupting nations in the process. Money opens doors, granting access to special privileges. Everyone, as they say, has a price.
Money is the evil that corrupts minds, motivating people to fulfil
the ideologies of those who have obtained power.
The powerful are rich because they manipulate others for their gain. Some say they lack empathy and are even controlled by negative forces. So if they do not care about ‘types’, why do they generate so much PR about ‘helping’ people? Perhaps to hide their true intentions and mislead the public about hidden agendas like The Great Reset, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030?The Philanthropy Sting
At first glance, one could naively perceive how humanitarian umbrella NGOs, trusts and non-profit charities are all set up for the benefit of humanity. Yet with some light digging around, the reality of the matter sinks in. With the salaries of those running the organisation already taking huge chunks of donations and the costs of advertising weighed in, the 'honourable' members of the board and agendas for those members become a lot clearer.
D Rockefeller was a master of deception. Not only has he managed to hijack 'modern' medicine, but his family legacy of deception has now continued well into the 21st century. Figures for so-called 'modern' illnesses are in direct correlation to the increases with so-called preventative health methods such as the vaccination programs. Big Pharma as a billion-dollar business, does not want healthy folks, taking care of their own health naturally – it doesn't make for good business.
The attempts by the richest and most powerful families, to cover up their real incentives - money and power. Always follow the money, then we see a chain forming:
– If you can see that the Rockefellers are bad, you can see that Gates is bad also.
– If you can see big pharma is bad, you can see that telecoms are bad – these are two of the biggest money-making industries. Is it any wonder they attract certain ‘types’?
– If you can track where all the money is being made and who is pushing vaccines and 5G - when the overwhelming evidence for both says they are bad for health, perhaps these rich and powerful people are all bad too? Weapons dealers are bad right? The Royal family don’t seem to think so:
– If you can see Lord Mountbatten is a predatory paedophile, you can see how Prince Philip and Prince Charles (mentored by Mountbatten), best friend of Jimmy Saville, is bad.
– If you see how Charles is bad, perhaps you can see how his brother, Prince Andrew - bessie mates with Jeffry Epstein, is bad. And if the high-rollers, celebrities and presidents like Clinton, appearing in Epstein’s black book, going to his pedo island - are also bad, then perhaps, when the missing Canadian children story comes up, you’ll realise The Queen has been doing bad things too. Princess Diana did write to her friend saying she believed her husband was landing to murder her in a car ‘accident’. So poorly reporting on this evidence, no further investigations of Prince Charles by Scotland Yard/MI5 and no proper trial to clear up the many discrepancies to the 'official' narrative - surely that makes the press, police and courts bad?
And because many of the Etonian governments are related to royalty, plus are on the boards of the corporations we already know are bad, perhaps the corporations are bad?
We're told that drugs are bad (but good for lining the pockets of the elites?) – and that society will be bad without conformity and unity enforced by our divine leaders....
...Yet countries controlled by royal families, the rich, powerful bankers and all their blood relations, have always manipulated the general populations through deceit, force, and fear – thriving off the profits in the wake of misery/oppression of other nations – all under the 'humanitarian' umbrella.
So why do WE think the rich and powerful are looking out for US? Why do we not take care of our own health and step up to remove the corruption?
Wilful Ignorance
Sheep are marked with a spot of brightly coloured ink. The vaccines contain ‘luciferese’ - a luminescent dye - trackable technology to manage the herd. Biblical stories talk about the ‘mark of the beast’ and the patents for these things are under number 060606. The occult practices of the elites are so obvious when one takes the time to look. The ongoing saga of vaccines is generally littered with stories of very poor results in favour of health and if the new rushed, poorly tested, experimental vaccines already have a huge list of adverse side effects (including death), does that make taking this jab an act of wilful ignorance? If we make decisions coming from a place of informed consent - are we effectively entering a pact with ‘the devil’? Giving our consent at the point of blood being released, is apparently how (black) magick works.
Comments
Post a Comment